Tuesday, February 07, 2012

Site Search

Intro To Deconstructing The Myth of AIDS

Intro To Deconstructing The Myth of AIDS

Intro To Deconstructing The Myth of AIDS By: Gary Nulls Facts: 1. AIDS diagnose in Africa is not the same as AIDS diagnose in the US 2. AIDS barely THirty Years old 3. There is a slightly different definition on what AIDS is and whether you have AIDS in different regions of the world. 4. AIDS test WEStern BLOt TEst is not used in every country, most countries say it isn’t reliable. 5. Psychology study of the human mind. (If you want someone to do something LIKE DIE, YOU COULD Tell a convincing lie with evidence over and over to that person or you could tell a very convincing lie with evidence once or twice,make them believe that that is the absolute truth and there is no other truth. 6. If done correctly this way you could make a completely haelthy person believe they are going to die or even cause a person to kill themselves slowly by controling there mind. human mind very powerful, but very easily manipulated. Important Websites all who watch should check these out. www.garynull.com, tetrahedron.com, rense.com, Blackgenocide.org, Aidsmyth.com Important People/Google Search 1. Dr. Strecker. 2. Dr. Horowitz. 3. Alfred Hassig, MD. Prof. of Immunology at University of Bern. 4. Stephen Lanka, Ph.D Microbiologist, Virologist. 5. Kary Mullis Ph.D Nobel Laureate Chemistry. 6. David Rasnick President of the Group for Scientific Reapraisal of HIV/AIDS. 7. Lynn Gannett Former AZT Researcher. 8. John Lauritsen Author of “Poison by Prescription”. 9. Celia Farber Journalist. 10.Val
Video Rating: 3 / 5

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

Related Western Blot Articles



25 Comments

  1. Comments  dirtydonki   |  Sunday, 22 August 2010 at 11:22 pm

    The truth will set you free!
    HIV does not exist.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  2. Comments  aztsucks   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 12:13 am

    aztsuckscom AZTSUCKS facebook

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  3. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 1:01 am

    @fupasack2 You want to see me debate that twat? Go to this video…he can’t censor me there

    Investigating Infanticide – Mildmay AIDS Centre, Uganda Pt 2.:

    look what a lying little shit he is. I do not buy that guy as a scientist. He’s too stupid. Did you check his credentials? he told me he has a masters degree but then I saw him claiming to have published a bunch of papers which would mean he is a PhD if I’m not mistaken. I don’t think he has any credentials at all.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  4. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 1:30 am

    You get over it…even GALLO never found any such virus in any of aids patients.

    Ad populum “arguments” do not change that.

    Sorry…I grew up with it in the family. I have personally seen the UNMEDICATED junkies outlive the medicated health nuts. Some youtube guy who never took the time to investigate ANYTHING isn’t going to make the dead rise up from the grave or the living drop dead. It past tense.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  5. Comments  803brando   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 1:59 am

    just get over it, statistics dont lie. the overwhelming majority of people with hiv that choose to deny its threat die of aids complications. In theory you people are doing the human species a favor by means of population control. so go ahead deny it and die in a decade or so.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  6. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 2:53 am

    Etienne de Harven M.D. is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.

    concordance doesn’t like people to post quotes on his videos. He doesn’t want it widely known the caliber of scientists who dissent. It screws up his best ad populum “evidence”

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  7. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 3:30 am

    “…..1) HIV particles have never been demonstrated by electron microscopy in the blood stream of AIDS patients allegedly presenting with high viral load…..

    4) Public credulity is abused by the constant publication of HIV images that all derive from electron microscopy of laboratory cell cultures, and never derive directly from AIDS patients.”

    quote is by…

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  8. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 4:06 am

    The Perth video.

    His statistic is ad populum aka “proof” by consensus. If the majority of the planet believes in a flying teapot does that make it real? No

    He says he has a masters degree & that he has never worked with hiv or I think with humans often if at all. As for the EM’s of “hiv” 1st…even Gallo never found any such virus. Look at this letter…google

    A Selection of hiv Documents Evidence of Fraud?

    The letter is from the head of the EM Dept of the NIH to Gallo…WHAT virus Gallo?

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  9. Comments  fupasack2   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 4:58 am

    he sure does sound like a scientist when he is talking about the lentiviruses. can you tell me what video you were debating him on in which he blocked you?

    and what about his statistic that says about 98% of scientist agree HIV causes aids?

    this is what he said, “I can lay my hands on dozens of electron micrographs of HIV budding from monocytes in culture”. i would think only a scientist would have that access…???

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  10. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 5:52 am

    See this on youtube…my story is anecdotal…I have no intention of giving out enough personal info to prove anything I’ve said about my situation. This person comes complete with medical records however…on youtube

    The Living Proof The Lindsey Nagel Story

    her medical records are in the deansmay link in the video description box. There are many other but…pretty young lady good PR etc ya know

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  11. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 6:17 am

    I grew up with this is in the family. You start to notice inconsistencies in what you see and what we’ve been told but I figured…there are always exceptions. After 20 years though I realized I knew ONLY exceptions to the doctrine. I have personally seen the UNmedicated junkies outlive the medicated health nuts. So for me it’s easy to see which side makes more sense…I just have to look around me and see who is alive and who is dead. It’s past tense now.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  12. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 6:40 am

    Ok..got it. Yep. That’s the guy. He specially likes ad hominem ad populum aka “proof” by consensus false dilemmas guilt by association non sequiturs etc etc as “evidence”

    I checked his sources which isn’t easy because he doesn’t leave links for people. One of the papers which he claims refutes the Perth Groups’ complaint the Western Blot evaluation criteria are inconsistent has NOTHING to do with Western Blot.

    That idiot never reads past the titles of the papers he references.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  13. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 6:48 am

    That link didn’t work but I saw you subscribed to concordance so if it;s that guy then no…he is NOT a scientist on the matter. You could write the book on logical fallacies using just that guy;s videos as examples. Also…he blocks everyone who makes him look stupid and that includes me. He never reads past the titles of the studies he references. I already know where to go to hear what actual scientists with identities I can easily verify have to say about the issue.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  14. Comments  fupasack2   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 7:35 am

    you should watch this video and talk to this guy. he is a scientist on the matter. talk to him and get back to me on it.

    /watch?v=7sNyh6UccAk

    he seems pretty smart. he has also got some other videos on it. i really want to know what you think of him. start a debate with him. you both know more than i do about this subject

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  15. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 7:43 am

    To go straight to the quotes on aids page google…

    IS HIV REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?
    ARE THERE REALLY ONLY A FEW
    SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  16. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 8:23 am

    You can also read about how he got involved in aids research here…..The AIDS Debate – The Most Controversial Story You’ve Never Heard
    by Liam Scheff

    published in the Boston Weekly Dig, May 2003.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  17. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 8:25 am

    “As a scientist who has studied AIDS for 16 years, I have determined that AIDS has little to do with science and is not even primarily a medical issue. AIDS is a sociological phenomenon held together by fear, creating a kind of medical McCarthyism that has transgressed and collapsed all the rules of science, and has imposed a brew of belief and pseudoscience on a vulnerable public.

    Spin, June 1997

    Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  18. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 8:34 am

    He has not made that claim. Quite the opposite in fact.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  19. Comments  fupasack2   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 9:20 am

    rasnick admitted himself he had never studied aids.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  20. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 9:48 am

    Actually…you people are allergic to the truth…I’ll post his reply myself

    “Visiting scholar status with UC Berkeley had been terminated, without my knowledge, in 2005, after I had moved to SA. I now list my affiliation as Senior Researcher for the Dr Rath Health Foundation. Critics of Aids orthodoxy must be as pristine as possible. Otherwise we are subject to attack instead of addressing our arguments, as evidenced by Professor Harland’s comments”

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  21. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 10:09 am

    The tests that the entire virus of mass destruction theory of immune suppression revolve around have no reference standard. How could they? Even the “discoverer” never actually found any in any of his aids patients. The direct link to Abbott Diagnostics is on my channel. Click and scroll down…

    “…..no recognized standards….”

    i.e. they are UNSTANDARDIZED crap.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  22. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 10:10 am

    YOU’RE the fat liar. He’s been studying aids since the early 80′s well before Gallo decided to falsify his data steal a sample and bypass peer review by calling a press conference. I suggest you look A LOT deeper into the issue than wiki*****pedia.

    Start with Gallo’s fabulous “evidence” google

    A Selection of Hiv Documents Evidence of Fraud?

    make special note of Gonda’s letter to Gallo….WHAT virus Gallo?

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  23. Comments  mykoolaidtastesfunny   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 11:04 am

    Wow…someone has been reading wiki. Now post Dr. Rasnick’s reply.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  24. Comments  fupasack2   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 11:22 am

    David Rasnick has no affiliation with the University of California, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology.
    One should obviously be concerned that someone who misrepresents his own affiliation might also misrepresent data and arguments in other areas.
    RICHARD HARLAND
    University of California, Berkeley, Dept of Molecular and Cell Biology

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

  25. Comments  fupasack2   |  Monday, 23 August 2010 at 12:09 pm

    right after the intro comes a man named david rasnick. the video says he is a berkly professor which is a flat out lie. and he has never done any real studies on HIV. and he is most definately not the developer of the protease inhibitors for AIDS victims.

    right there. the guy that claims to have the strongest argument, is actually a fat liar.

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes   No

Leave a Reply




Western Blot Main Menu